Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Maryland

Brandon Shores

Curtis Bay, MD · ~168 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brandon Shores runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Brandon Shores: 2.0 TCR = 170% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brandon Shores safety composite

Brandon Shores scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2018

Brandon Shores injury rate improved

Brandon Shores's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.2 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.2 · 2018=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Curtis Bay, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 170% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO 300A
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 300A (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Brandon Shores in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brandon Shores averages 2.0 TCR (170% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brandon Shores TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Brandon Shores falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Electric power generation, fos employers in Maryland.

Brandon Shores (168 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brandon Shores
Brandon Shores (168 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Brandon Shores has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2017 2.2 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MD · Curtis Bay

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Curtis Bay, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 300A 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller Steam Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rocky Mountain Energy Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casco Bay Energy Company LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Berkel Shoring Washington DC 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Bond Building Products - Baltimore 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2244 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0471 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manuel Luis Construction Company, Inc./M Luis Products, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAL-ODFL 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03775 - Baltimore Hauling 131 FTE
NAT-TCR HoneywellVA08 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #751 (Sisseton, SD) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rich Creek Grants Supermarket 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Schultheis Roofing INC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE University Health 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherwood Foods-Florida 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Palms Resort and Spa (UC) 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Health Care Center - Orange Park 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.