Environmental health program administration · Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester

Rochester, MN · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Environmental health program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester: 1.5 TCR = 47% of Environmental health program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester safety composite

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.99× in 2019

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 47% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #19/29
  • PHOTO Maricopa County - Pu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maricopa County - Public Fiduciary (340) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester averages 1.5 TCR (47% of the Environmental health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester falls in its industry

267 Environmental health program a establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 29 Environmental health program a employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester (26 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester
Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester (26 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Minnesota Department of Health - Rochester has fewer employees than the Environmental health program administrat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · MN · Rochester

267 Environmental health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Public Fiduciary (340) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA - CYBH Crisis Assessment Team 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (50) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA - Health Promotion Division 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Distribution 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 190 - Stroudsburg 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Garney Holding Company 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S07558 - WM Brown Deer C and D Recycling 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE wrens iga 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trucks & Parts of Tampa, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Department of Corrections - Macomb Parole 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.