Laundries, linen and uniform supply · California

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600

Oceanside, CA · ~98 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laundries, linen and uniform supply workplace, earning a grade F.

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600: 7.5 TCR = 358% of Laundries, linen and uniform supply BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 safety composite

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2018→2024

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 injury rate improved

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600's TCR fell 7.0 from 12.3 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.3 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=12.7 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812331 · Oceanside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 358% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #30/40
  • PHOTO Balfurd, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Balfurd, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 averages 7.5 TCR (358% of the Laundries, linen and uniform supply BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 TCR series: 2018=12.3 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=12.7 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 falls in its industry

334 Laundries, linen and uniform s establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 40 Laundries, linen and uniform s employers in California.

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 (98 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Linen Oceanside 2600
Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 (98 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 has fewer employees than the Laundries, linen and uniform supply median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2023 12.7 12.7 13 0 0
2022 8.7 7.7 9 0 0
2021 5.4 4.3 5 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 6 0 0
2018 12.3 11.3 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812331 · CA · Oceanside

334 Laundries, linen and uniform supply employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 164 employers in Oceanside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Balfurd, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Linen Supply San Diego 3402 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Linen Supply Oxnard California 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Premier Laundry 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal GVIC Ranches 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapala Berry Farms 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag-Wise Enterprises, Inc 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bains Orchards Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Oceanside 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR USPH - Oceanside Genentech 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZOCE 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Seabird - A Destination Hotel 474 FTE
NAT-TCR Hope Plant 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Starkey Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Specialty Food Solutions- Jensen 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversicare of Big Springs 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of LaFollette 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Steel Company 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Denver 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston Office 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.