Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, straw), manufacturing · South Dakota

Sioux Steel Company

Sioux Falls, SD · ~98 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sioux Steel Company runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, straw), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Sioux Steel Company: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, straw), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sioux Steel Company safety composite

Sioux Steel Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2018→2024

Sioux Steel Company injury rate improved

Sioux Steel Company's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.7 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Sioux Falls, SD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/14
  • PHOTO Hagie Manufacturing
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hagie Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Sioux Steel Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sioux Steel Company averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, straw), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sioux Steel Company TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2019=3 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sioux Steel Company falls in its industry

433 Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotto establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 14 Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotto employers in South Dakota.

Sioux Steel Company (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sioux Steel Company
Sioux Steel Company (98 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Sioux Steel Company has more employees than the Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, st median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.1 2.1 3 0 0
2019 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2018 2.7 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · SD · Sioux Falls

433 Balers, farm-type (e.g., cotton, hay, straw), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 542 employers in Sioux Falls, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hagie Manufacturing 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haber Technologies, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bush Hog Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avera Milbank Area Hospital 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jensen Rock & Sand 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Carlson Construction 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volga 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,Sioux Falls-Medical Center Campus-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 6,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,SIOUX FALLS - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 4,818 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Foods 3,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avera McKennan Hospital 3,312 FTE
NAT-TCR Mitsubishi Electric US Inc.-18 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CoServ Elecrtic 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TW Metals - Wichita 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR P&L Specialties 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smooth-Bor Plastics 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jem Unlimited Iron, Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Linen Oceanside 2600 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of LaFollette 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.