Packaging machinery manufacturing · Missouri

Missouri Tooling & Automation

Lebanon, MO · ~45 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Missouri Tooling & Automation runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Missouri Tooling & Automation: 2.2 TCR = 65% of Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Missouri Tooling & Automation safety composite

Missouri Tooling & Automation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2023

Missouri Tooling & Automation injury rate improved

Missouri Tooling & Automation's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Lebanon, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Butler Automatic
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Butler Automatic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Missouri Tooling & Automation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Missouri Tooling & Automation averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Missouri Tooling & Automation TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Missouri Tooling & Automation falls in its industry

269 Packaging machinery manufactur establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Packaging machinery manufactur employers in Missouri.

Missouri Tooling & Automation (45 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Missouri Tooling & Automation
Missouri Tooling & Automation (45 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Missouri Tooling & Automation has fewer employees than the Packaging machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2021 7.0 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · MO · Lebanon

269 Packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 64 employers in Lebanon, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Butler Automatic 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massman Automation Design 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDL Massman LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texwrap Packaging Systems LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 80X - Nuclear - Leadership Team 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barry Electric Cooperative, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 052 - Mackenzie 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macon Electric Cooperative 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR White River Marine Group, LLC Lebanon, MO 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lebanon Tracker 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Climate Technologies 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tracker Marine-Lebanon 778 FTE
NAT-TCR Klute Steel Fabrication 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Terrapin Beer Company-Athens 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR McC Corporate Office 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kirby Risk Electrical Supply Terre Haute 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Methods Machine Tools, Inc - Michigan 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Tree Service 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7-SIGMA Incorporated 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team JAS, Inc 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.