Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · North Carolina

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping

Edenton, NC · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping safety composite

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping: 1.9 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping's TCR rose 1.7 from 1.9 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Edenton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Allegiant Manufactur…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allegiant Manufacturing - Maryville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Metal stampings (except automo employers in North Carolina.

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping (50 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping
MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping (50 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

MiTek USA, Inc. - Edenton Stamping has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · NC · Edenton

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 27 employers in Edenton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allegiant Manufacturing - Maryville 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brainin Advance Industries 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pressed Metal Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metalcraft Industries, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrell and Johnny Williams 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wadesboro Hatchery / Transp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Region Office (Cary) 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEMC - Youngsville 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Chowan Hospital 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Chowan Hospital 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jimbos Jumbos 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regulator Marine, Inc. 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Country Fresh Mushroom Co. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn Austin N 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Healthcare 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative (NOVEC) 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2000 - Environmental Denver CO (inc 2000,2001,2005,2008) 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millwood Inc. - Vienna 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Center for Community - Sitka 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper North Kansas City 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.