Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manufacturing · California

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion

Sacramento, CA · ~158 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion safety composite

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2019→2020

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion injury rate improved

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.7 in 2019 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.7 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325220 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK P50
  • PHOTO Plant 78
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 78 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion falls in its industry

68 Acrylonitrile fibers and filam establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion (158 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion
mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion (158 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0

mitsubishi chemical carbon fiber and composites, Carbon fiber divsion has fewer employees than the Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325220 · CA · Sacramento

68 Acrylonitrile fibers and filaments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 78 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellVA08 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Labor Service of Central Cal, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moreno Valley #046 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Redlands 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAYLIGHT FOODS INC 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemstone Foods Plant 1 - 02 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaco-Wi (Bp) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6396-Sprenger Health Care of Massillon 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jenco, Inc. 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alsip Production 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Mfg 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.