Compressors, motor vehicle air-conditioning, manufacturing · Indiana

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc.

Franklin, IN · ~158 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Compressors, motor vehicle air-conditioning, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 78% of Compressors, motor vehicle air-conditioning, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. safety composite

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc.: 3.4 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2020

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.0 from 3.4 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Franklin, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 78% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #42/66
  • PHOTO 3219 TX Wheel Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3219 TX Wheel Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (78% of the Compressors, motor vehicle air-conditioning, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2018=5 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.3 · BLS 5.4

Where Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. falls in its industry

772 Compressors, motor vehicle air establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 66 Compressors, motor vehicle air employers in Indiana.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc. has more employees than the Compressors, motor vehicle air-condition median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.3 2.9 5 0 0
2019 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2018 5.0 2.8 11 0 0
2016 3.4 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · IN · Franklin

772 Compressors, motor vehicle air-conditioning, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 78 employers in Franklin, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3219 TX Wheel Plant 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inalfa Roof Systems - AHA 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innotive Tech Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boysen USA, LLC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwestern Electric LLC 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Evansville 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jet Technologies, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ottenweller Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Headquarters 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Memorial Health 878 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAC Franklin 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reman Powertrain Indiana 473 FTE
NAT-TCR A Cut Above Exteriors, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Valley Sewickley 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ernst Enterprises of GA Lawrenceville 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hft #9 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Crisco Plant 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Mfg 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evonik Corporation Greensboro 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARYZTA - Hazleton 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.