Forklifts manufacturing · Texas

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston)

Houston, TX · ~1,016 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Forklifts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston): 0.8 TCR = 24% of Forklifts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) safety composite

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) injury rate improved

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston)'s TCR fell 0.4 from 0.8 in 2022 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333924 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Equipment Depot Ohio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~1,016 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Equipment Depot Ohio, Inc - Cincinnati (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Forklifts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) falls in its industry

167 Forklifts manufacturing establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Forklifts manufacturing employers in Texas.

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) (1,016 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston)
Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) (1,016 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) has more employees than the Forklifts manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 4 0 0
2023 1.2 1.1 14 0 0
2022 0.8 0.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333924 · TX · Houston

167 Forklifts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Equipment Depot Ohio, Inc - Cincinnati 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equipment Depot Texas, Inc. - Dallas/Ft. Worth 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equipment Depot Ohio, Inc - Lebanon 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIBA Technologies, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Liquid Environmental Solutions of Texas, LLC 1,016 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW5 1,017 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX_Irving_3301 W. Royal Lane_CCDAL014 1,017 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCA Houston Conroe 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR T.P. Electric, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Waukesha Prolec GE 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Target Container), Inc. Austell, GA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR L.M. Sessler Excavating & Wrecking, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northeast Arc 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morton Processing Plant 1,016 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.