Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · South Carolina

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.

Greer, SC · ~466 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. safety composite

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.4 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2020=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Greer, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO Fayetteville Works
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~466 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fayetteville Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. falls in its industry

303 Polyester film and unlaminated establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Polyester film and unlaminated employers in South Carolina.

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. (466 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. (466 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. has more employees than the Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.3 0.6 6 0 0
2018 1.2 1.0 6 0 0
2017 1.4 1.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · SC · Greer

303 Polyester film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fayetteville Works 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avery Dennison Lowell 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klockner Pentaplast of America Gordonsville 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azek Building Products- Decking 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE USA Bennettsville SC Oak River North 467 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schneider Electric - Seneca 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Mills 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
NAT-TCR US_SCLA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Americas Resins and Global FM : Springfield RD Lab 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 535 - Elizabeth-Int Branch 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bolton & Menk - Ramsey 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sony DADC TH 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essity Professional Hygiene North America - Neenah Converting 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSC Store Support Center 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barriere Construction Co., L.L.C. 466 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.