Thrust roller bearings manufacturing · South Carolina

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1

Fort Mill, SC · ~468 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Thrust roller bearings manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Thrust roller bearings manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 safety composite

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1: 2.9 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1's TCR rose 1.2 from 2.9 in 2020 to 4.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332991 · Fort Mill, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Schaeffler Aerospace…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~468 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schaeffler Aerospace USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Thrust roller bearings manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 TCR series: 2020=2.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 falls in its industry

125 Thrust roller bearings manufac establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Thrust roller bearings manufac employers in South Carolina.

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 (468 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 131 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1
Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 (468 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 131 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Fort Mill 1 has more employees than the Thrust roller bearings manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.7 13 2 0
2023 3.7 3.5 16 0 0
2022 3.3 1.8 16 0 0
2021 1.8 1.2 6 3 0
2020 2.9 2.4 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332991 · SC · Fort Mill

125 Thrust roller bearings manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schaeffler Aerospace USA 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heim Bearings 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morganton - Burke Drive 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koyo Richland Plant 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schneider Electric - Seneca 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Bennettsville SC Oak River North 467 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Florence - 0820 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR Draxler Transport, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Annapolis Junction 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KR Acquisitions 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fortune Metal Midwest, LLC GA 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sun Communities-Corporate Office 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michaels Distribution Center #5 - Berlin 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stryker Instruments - 6201 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1039 - Niles 468 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.