PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing · Tennessee

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center

Rockford, TN · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center: 1.9 TCR = 57% of PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center safety composite

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2024

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Rockford, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK P29
  • PHOTO Coherent Corp
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coherent Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Molecular Imaging - Detector Center averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Molecular Imaging - Detector Center falls in its industry

242 PET (positron emission tomogra establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Molecular Imaging - Detector Center (63 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Molecular Imaging - Detector Center
Molecular Imaging - Detector Center (63 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Molecular Imaging - Detector Center has fewer employees than the PET (positron emission tomography) scann median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.6 1.4 4 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · TN · Rockford

242 PET (positron emission tomography) scanners manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 11 employers in Rockford, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coherent Corp 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CN Irvine 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN110 TSE 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gentherm Medical 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ROSE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neuhoff 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Constructors, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHERRY PAINTING COMPANY, INC dba CHERRY COATINGS NASHVILLE 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flex-N-Gate 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flex-N-Gate Rockford Inc 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR 207 - KNOXVILLE 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AESSEAL 127 FTE
NAT-TCR Cal-Main Foods Inc. Edwards 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AGP Algona Methyl Ester 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR School Specialty, Inc. - Mansfield 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR COH Municipal Court/City Attourney Criminal/Alternative Sentencing 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LRD 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheatland Memorial Healthcare 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELP 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACE- Winslow Operations 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.