Automotive, truck and bus suspension assemblies and parts (except springs) manufacturing · Michigan

Monroe

Monroe, MI · ~73 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monroe runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automotive, truck and bus suspension assemblies and parts (except springs) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Monroe: 2.9 TCR = 53% of Automotive, truck and bus suspension assemblies and parts (except springs) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monroe safety composite

Monroe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Monroe held a steady TCR band

Monroe's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336330 · Monroe, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/35
  • PHOTO Air Lift Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Air Lift Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monroe averages 2.9 TCR (53% of the Automotive, truck and bus suspension assemblies and parts (except springs) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monroe TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Monroe falls in its industry

134 Automotive, truck and bus susp establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 35 Automotive, truck and bus susp employers in Michigan.

Monroe (73 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 192 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Monroe
Monroe (73 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 192 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Monroe has fewer employees than the Automotive, truck and bus suspension ass median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2022 7.3 4.5 8 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 0 1 0
2018 10.3 10.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336330 · MI · Monroe

134 Automotive, truck and bus suspension assemblies and parts (except springs) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 96 employers in Monroe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Air Lift Company 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robert Bosch Automotive Steering, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yokohama Industries Americas South Carolina, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASI-ST 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Work 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michiana SC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Portland 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Powerline, LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Regional Hospital 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frenchtown 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau - Monroe Mill 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Power Plant 495 FTE
NAT-TCR J & A Solari Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 3050 Keystone E. Peoria 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Container Corp. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Families First 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwest Landscape Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leon D. DeMatteis Construction Corporation 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Joy Farmers Co-op Association 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alderfer Glass Co 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.