Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard · South Carolina

Monroe Packaging - Greer

Greer, SC · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monroe Packaging - Greer runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Monroe Packaging - Greer: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monroe Packaging - Greer safety composite

Monroe Packaging - Greer scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Monroe Packaging - Greer: 2.9 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.75× in 2021

Monroe Packaging - Greer's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.9 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Greer, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #11/23
  • PHOTO International Paper …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Paper Biglerville Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Monroe Packaging - Greer in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monroe Packaging - Greer averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monroe Packaging - Greer TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Monroe Packaging - Greer falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated paper made from pur establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 23 Corrugated paper made from pur employers in South Carolina.

Monroe Packaging - Greer (33 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Monroe Packaging - Greer
Monroe Packaging - Greer (33 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Monroe Packaging - Greer has fewer employees than the Corrugated paper made from purchased pap median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · SC · Greer

1,338 Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Paper Biglerville Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Fort Smith South 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Royal Group - Marion 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HIGH POINT, NC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEC- Johns Island Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE MYRTLE BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center PNG 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hogan Construction - Greenville 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
NAT-TCR Indian Summer Coop 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KYENT Nicholasville Road 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TMEC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeastern New Hampshire Services 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fowler Transfer Station 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City, MO Rail Shop 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson Bros. Construction 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vegetation Management West, LP 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.