Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · North Carolina

Cliffside Steam Station

Mooresboro, NC · ~114 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cliffside Steam Station runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Cliffside Steam Station: 0.6 TCR = 50% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cliffside Steam Station safety composite

Cliffside Steam Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cliffside Steam Station held a steady TCR band

Cliffside Steam Station's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Mooresboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO Westbrook Energy Cen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westbrook Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cliffside Steam Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cliffside Steam Station averages 0.6 TCR (50% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cliffside Steam Station TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=2 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Cliffside Steam Station falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in North Carolina.

Cliffside Steam Station (114 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cliffside Steam Station
Cliffside Steam Station (114 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Cliffside Steam Station has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Mooresboro

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 5 employers in Mooresboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westbrook Energy Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monroe Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : Sandy Creek 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Telecom and Renewables Pennsylvania Statewide Operations 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Asphalt LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Mechanical Inc 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Zinc Products, LLC 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Befesa Zinc Metal 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mooresboro 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sequoia Services - Cliffside Plant / Rogers Energy Complex 49 FTE
NAT-TCR Duncan Operations Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mulberry Gardens Memory Care 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cruisin' Community Transit Connection, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Conlan Tire- Jacksonville SH 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tawas Tool Company 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tell Tool 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grower Merchandising Service LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.