Nuclear Electric Power Generation · Minnesota

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ

Name: Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Monticello, MN · ~403 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 3.3
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ: 3.3 TCR = 274% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ safety composite

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers
DART rate: F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ: 3.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2023

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ's TCR rose 0.5 from 3.0 in 2021 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Monticello, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.3 · 274% of ind

DART 3.2 DART
RANK #6/6
PHOTO Prairie Is Nuclear P…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~403 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie Is Nuclear Plant-HD (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.3
Prairie Is Nuc

2.6
Monticello Tra

2.5
8FB - Nuclear

2.4
Cook Nuclear

2

What this shows Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ averages 3.3 TCR (274% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ TCR series: 2021=3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Nuclear Electric Power Generat employers in Minnesota.

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ (403 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	3.5	3.2	2	11
2022	3.5	3.2	2	11
2021	3.0	2.5	3	9

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MN · Monticello

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 70 employers in Monticello, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Prairie Is Nuclear Plant-HD	WELCH, MN	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Monticello Training Ctr-LL	MONTICELLO, MN	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	8FB - Nuclear - Radiation Protection	STEEDMAN, MO	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cook Nuclear	BRIDGMAN, MI	2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Seneca Foods Corporation	GLENCOE	403 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BMIN	PLYMOUTH	403 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Tech Park	PLYMOUTH	403 FTE
STATE-SIZE	WM 2882	MAPLE GROVE	403 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Dist Office	Monticello	599 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Monticello High School	Monticello	588 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CCH Monticello	Monticello	571 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CentraCare Monticello	Monticello	487 FTE
NAT-TCR	The Blake at Colonial Club	Harahan, MS	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	HMA Paving Lewisburg	Winfield, PA	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Crozet Elementary School	Crozet, VA	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sonesta ES Suites Charlotte	Charlotte, NC	3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	CIC Construction Group, S.E.	Guaynabo, PR	403 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Well-Spring Retirement Community	Greensboro, NC	403 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Federal Mogul Powertrain	Van Wert, OH	403 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Sonny's Enterprises, LLC	Tamarac, FL	403 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.