Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Well-Spring Retirement Community

Greensboro, NC · ~403 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Well-Spring Retirement Community runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

Well-Spring Retirement Community: 3.0 TCR = 79% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Well-Spring Retirement Community safety composite

Well-Spring Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Well-Spring Retirement Community: 1.5 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2023

Well-Spring Retirement Community's TCR rose 1.9 from 1.5 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #17/105
  • PHOTO Willamette View, Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~403 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willamette View, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Well-Spring Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Well-Spring Retirement Community averages 3.0 TCR (79% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Well-Spring Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=4.1 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Well-Spring Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Well-Spring Retirement Community (403 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Well-Spring Retirement Community
Well-Spring Retirement Community (403 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Well-Spring Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 10 0 0
2017 4.1 1.9 11 0 0
2016 1.5 1.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Greensboro

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willamette View, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Southampton Estates 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bradfield Place 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwest Florida Retirement Center d/b/a Village On The Isle 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clancy & Theys Construction Company 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE GSOCW9820 GSO - USPS 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric Company 404 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sysco Raleigh 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Stores #5368 Williamsburg, VA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Logistics Tuscaloosa, AL 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater Paper Lewiston CPD 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston Medical Center-Stoughto 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CIC Construction Group, S.E. 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monticello Nuclear Plant-LJ 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonny's Enterprises, LLC 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE BMIN 403 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.