Sprockets, power transmission equipment, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc.

Little Chute, WI · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sprockets, power transmission equipment, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc.: 10.0 TCR = 304% of Sprockets, power transmission equipment, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc.: 8.0 → 12.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2017

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.2 from 8.0 in 2016 to 12.1 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333613 · Little Chute, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 304% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO Powertrain Rockford
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powertrain Rockford (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. averages 10.0 TCR (304% of the Sprockets, power transmission equipment, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=12.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

111 Sprockets, power transmission establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Sprockets, power transmission employers in Wisconsin.

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc.
Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sprockets, power transmission equipment, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 12.1 7.3 5 0 0
2016 8.0 5.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333613 · WI · Little Chute

111 Sprockets, power transmission equipment, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 29 employers in Little Chute, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powertrain Rockford 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belden Universal 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Babbitt Bearing 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barnes Industries 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crave Brothers Farm 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee South Shore 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARC Contracting of Wisconsin Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Pizza Co. - Little Chute 812 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trilliant Food & Nutrition 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building Services Group 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Business Systems LC 280 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Havasu (Azlak) 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Health - Hoopeston 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant UK 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Manor Inc Nursing Center 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Anita 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Chillicothe Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Nursing and Rehab LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insys Manufacturing, LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.