Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Mountain Vista Senior Living

Name: Mountain Vista Senior Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tucson, AZ · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.9
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountain Vista Senior Living runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Mountain Vista Senior Living: 2.9 TCR = 76% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountain Vista Senior Living safety composite

Mountain Vista Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mountain Vista Senior Living: 1.5 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Mountain Vista Senior Living's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.5 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 76% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #14/173
PHOTO Highland Park Assist…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highland Park Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.9
Highland Park

2.9
Tribute at Bla

2.9
Punta Gorda

2.9
Unisen Senior

2.9

What this shows Mountain Vista Senior Living averages 2.9 TCR (76% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Mountain Vista Senior Living TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mountain Vista Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Mountain Vista Senior Living (81 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mountain Vista Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	3.5	0.0	2
2019	1.7	1.7	1
2018	4.9	4.9	3
2017	1.5	1.5	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Tucson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Highland Park Assisted Living	ALLIANCE, NE	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tribute at Black Hill	SCOTTSDALE, AZ	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Punta Gorda	PUNTA GORDA, FL	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Unisen Senior Living	TAMPA, FL	2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Carrot Plant	TOLLESON	81 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Ocotillo Powerplant	TEMPE	81 FTE
STATE-SIZE	M. R. Tanner Construction	GILBERT	81 FTE
STATE-SIZE	THREE PHASE ELECTRIC, LLC	PHOENIX	81 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Arizona	Tucson	18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site	Tucson	9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tucson Medical Center	Tucson	4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR	U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson	Tucson	3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR	Skyview Schools	Oakdale, MN	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Angelica - Columbia	Columbia, SC	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 044	Newcastle, ME	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	035k - San Antonio Tx Rntl	San Antonio, TX	2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Hayden Station	Hayden, CO	81 FTE
NAT-SIZE	San Bernadino	San Bernadino, CA	81 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Aspen Living Center	Colorado Springs, CO	81 FTE
NAT-SIZE	HCP Coconut Creek FL OpCo, LLC	Coconut Creek, FL	81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.