Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Alabama

Movin' Iron, Inc.

Red Bay, AL · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Movin' Iron, Inc. runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Movin' Iron, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 90% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Movin' Iron, Inc. safety composite

Movin' Iron, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.7

2016→2024

Movin' Iron, Inc. injury rate improved

Movin' Iron, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.7 from 15.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Red Bay, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/90
  • PHOTO WESTERN TRANSPORT, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WESTERN TRANSPORT, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Movin' Iron, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Movin' Iron, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (90% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Movin' Iron, Inc. TCR series: 2016=15.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Movin' Iron, Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 90 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Alabama.

Movin' Iron, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Movin' Iron, Inc.
Movin' Iron, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Movin' Iron, Inc. has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2019 11.7 3.9 2 1 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 15.7 3.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · AL · Red Bay

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 16 employers in Red Bay, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WESTERN TRANSPORT, INC. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westco Express, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDIANAPOLIS DRY 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Breeder/Broilers Techs 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE IndusTREE Timber, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Gin Company Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Gadsden Live Haul 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffin Motorhomes Inc 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunshine Homes Inc 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffin Motorhomes Inc. Service 256 FTE
NAT-TCR Stratford Connecticut 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 135 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GMD Shipyard 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hw Recreation Department 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bergman Nurseries 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brickwall Corporation 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ceilings, Etc., Inc. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.