Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Pennsylvania

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP)

Shippensburg, PA · ~83 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP): 4.1 TCR = 90% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) safety composite

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2021

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) injury rate improved

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP)'s TCR fell 2.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Shippensburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 90% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #100/172
  • PHOTO MOVIN' IRON, INC.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MOVIN' IRON, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) averages 4.1 TCR (90% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=6 · 2021=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 172 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Pennsylvania.

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) (83 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP)
Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) (83 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Shippensburg, PA (WC USX SHP) has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2020 6.0 4.5 4 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 6.3 5.0 5 0 0
2016 5.0 2.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · PA · Shippensburg

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Shippensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MOVIN' IRON, INC. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTERN TRANSPORT, INC. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westco Express, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDIANAPOLIS DRY 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MD Basciani & Sons, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hillis Group, pLLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Ford City 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HGR5 856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Construction Equipment 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schenker Inc. (P&G-Shippensburg) 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR JLG - Shippensburg 512 FTE
NAT-TCR Stratford EMS Department 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 054158-La Mesa Po 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 113082-Fmy-Downtown Sta 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 117637-Pom-Coconut Creek Br 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gwinnett EM/Rental 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP St Petersburg, LLC--Golfview 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Dental 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanes Dye and Finishing 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.