Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

MPT Sterling Heights

Sterling Heights, MI · ~200 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MPT Sterling Heights runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

MPT Sterling Heights: 4.5 TCR = 84% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MPT Sterling Heights safety composite

MPT Sterling Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

MPT Sterling Heights injury rate improved

MPT Sterling Heights's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=5.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Sterling Heights, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #75/165
  • PHOTO Leffel Works
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leffel Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

MPT Sterling Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MPT Sterling Heights averages 4.5 TCR (84% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MPT Sterling Heights TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=5.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 5.4

Where MPT Sterling Heights falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

MPT Sterling Heights (200 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate MPT Sterling Heights
MPT Sterling Heights (200 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

MPT Sterling Heights has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 4 0 0
2023 2.7 1.2 7 0 0
2020 5.5 1.6 7 0 0
2019 6.1 4.5 14 1 0
2018 3.8 1.0 9 2 0
2017 6.7 3.7 20 0 0
2016 4.7 2.2 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Sterling Heights

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leffel Works 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merit Technologies Worldwide 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Challenge Manufacturing - Kansas City Manufacturing 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black River Stamping & Automation (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 4) 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-American Group 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mall City Mechanical 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexco Grand Rapids-Walker 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR OptiMIM LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rfc Ct 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 028-MDW 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaytee 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elk Grove 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0039 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Beach Nursing & Rehabiliation Center 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation- Valhalla, NY 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.