General services departments, government · Illinois

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center

Mount Prospect, IL · ~518 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade B.

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center: 1.9 TCR = 59% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center safety composite

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center: 0.6 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2018

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.6 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Mount Prospect, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #27/213
  • PHOTO City of Tempe Intern…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~518 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Tempe Internal Services Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=3.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 213 General services departments, employers in Illinois.

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center (518 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center
Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center (518 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.2 0.5 6 0 0
2017 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · IL · Mount Prospect

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 65 employers in Mount Prospect, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Tempe Internal Services Department 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 113 - Information Technology 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administration 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KGAD ADMINISTRATION BLDG 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Solutions International 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE BorgWarner Transmission Systems LLC 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Innovation Center 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Rabida Children's Hospital 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mtp 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR CPI Mount Prospect 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radienz Living 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2967-IL154 284 FTE
NAT-TCR Sister Schubert's; Luverne 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HF Optimeyes Dearborn 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Power Oak Grove 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5069 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE C036 Cincinnati 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brady Trane Service, Inc. 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Anaheim, Anaheim West Tower 518 FTE
NAT-SIZE TTM Technologies Stafford 518 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.