General services departments, government · Arizona

City of Tempe Internal Services Department

Tempe, AZ · ~210 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Tempe Internal Services Department runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade B.

City of Tempe Internal Services Department: 1.9 TCR = 59% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Tempe Internal Services Department safety composite

City of Tempe Internal Services Department scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2018

City of Tempe Internal Services Department injury rate improved

City of Tempe Internal Services Department's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.2 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2018=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Tempe, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/82
  • PHOTO Mt Prospect Park Dis…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

City of Tempe Internal Services Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Tempe Internal Services Department averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Tempe Internal Services Department TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=0.6 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Tempe Internal Services Department falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 82 General services departments, employers in Arizona.

City of Tempe Internal Services Department (210 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Tempe Internal Services Department
City of Tempe Internal Services Department (210 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Tempe Internal Services Department has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.2 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · AZ · Tempe

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mt Prospect Park District Central Community Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 113 - Information Technology 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administration 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KGAD ADMINISTRATION BLDG 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Texas - Houston Division 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmeng Construction, Inc. 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE 660-00063 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Operations 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR SALT RIVER PROJECT DISTRICT VALLEY 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 202376 4,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Pontiac 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Pittsburg 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sister Schubert's; Luverne 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewood10 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marietta 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGH Enterprises - Ontario, CA 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harvest Pipeline Company 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morris Hills Center 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.