Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Texas

MT Texas, LLC

San Antonio, TX · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MT Texas, LLC runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

MT Texas, LLC: 5.6 TCR = 170% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MT Texas, LLC safety composite

MT Texas, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MT Texas, LLC: 6.5 → 12.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2024

MT Texas, LLC's TCR rose 5.6 from 6.5 in 2016 to 12.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 170% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #19/20
  • PHOTO Precision Mold & Too…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Mold & Tool Govt. Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

MT Texas, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MT Texas, LLC averages 5.6 TCR (170% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MT Texas, LLC TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.1 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=12 · BLS 3.3

Where MT Texas, LLC falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Texas.

MT Texas, LLC (42 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate MT Texas, LLC
MT Texas, LLC (42 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

MT Texas, LLC has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.0 7.2 5 0 0
2023 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2022 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 6.1 4.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.5 4.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · TX · San Antonio

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Mold & Tool Govt. Division 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aircraft Technology 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skilled Manufacturing - Aerospace Division 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DRT Aerospace LLC Meriden CT 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Southeast 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXAS BEEF PRODUCERS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3-H Dairy LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Pro-Fabrication, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Syracuse Home Association 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Powell's Books -- Industrial Warehouse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Houghton Facility 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Styline Logistics Warehouse 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Encantada #555 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bailsco Blades and Castings, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Hotel Liberty 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.