Passenger air transportation, scheduled · Texas

Richardson Aviation

Fort Worth, TX · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richardson Aviation runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Passenger air transportation, scheduled workplace, earning a grade B.

Richardson Aviation: 3.5 TCR = 77% of Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richardson Aviation safety composite

Richardson Aviation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2016→2024

Richardson Aviation injury rate improved

Richardson Aviation's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/146
  • PHOTO 6925-GUM
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6925-GUM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Richardson Aviation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richardson Aviation averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richardson Aviation TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Richardson Aviation falls in its industry

1,568 Passenger air transportation, establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 146 Passenger air transportation, employers in Texas.

Richardson Aviation (42 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Richardson Aviation
Richardson Aviation (42 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Richardson Aviation has fewer employees than the Passenger air transportation, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 0 1 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 9.7 9.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · TX · Fort Worth

1,568 Passenger air transportation, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6925-GUM 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-HOU-HOUSTON - HOBBY-EAGLE ACS 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730040-CS IDA - IDAHO FALLS, ID 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gus Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Southeast 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXAS BEEF PRODUCERS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3-H Dairy LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR CGH Dixon Health Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rich's Towing & Service Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland EPS Plant 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #91 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mullen Industral Handling Corp 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Oklahoma City 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaBarge (Dehy) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hitt Electric Corporation 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.