Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Multi Precision Detail, Inc.

Auburn Hills, MI · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Multi Precision Detail, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. safety composite

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Multi Precision Detail, Inc.: 0.0 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Multi Precision Detail, Inc.'s TCR rose 7.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 7.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Auburn Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/131
  • PHOTO Unique Model, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unique Model, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multi Precision Detail, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Multi Precision Detail, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 131 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Michigan.

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Multi Precision Detail, Inc.
Multi Precision Detail, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Multi Precision Detail, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 6.8 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Auburn Hills

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unique Model, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zintech, ClearCut DieWorks 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tools, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schoitz Engineering Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR SCC - 1340 Tully Rd, SJ 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pentagon EMS 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NASG Tennessee North 1, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Illinois Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0200 Houston Texas 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson and Maddox Construction Co., Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patriot 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Mold Shop Inc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.