Solar Construction and Design · California

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point

San Diego, CA · ~137 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Solar Construction and Design workplace, earning a grade A.

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Solar Construction and Design BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point safety composite

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2018

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point injury rate improved

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/147
  • PHOTO Haugland Energy Grou…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haugland Energy Group LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Solar Construction and Design BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.8

Where NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point falls in its industry

1,605 Solar Construction and Design establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 147 Solar Construction and Design employers in California.

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point (137 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point
NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point (137 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NA-US-CA-San Diego-Mercury Point has more employees than the Solar Construction and Design median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · San Diego

1,605 Solar Construction and Design employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haugland Energy Group LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCG Utilities, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RedTail Hawk Solar Project 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104983 - Myrtle PV Solar 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE DIVERSIFIED FARM LABOR INC 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE A C FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR INC 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN Farms Inc 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE BVLS 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Clover Technologies Group, LLC - Hoffman Barrington 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich ES - ISR Systems 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich - Turbine Fuel Technologies- (RS271) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CHI - Airport United Airlines Offices 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consumer Solutions Division - West 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Nursing and Rehab 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Health Care Center - Grosse Pointe Woods 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.