Safety net system, erecting and dismantling at construction site · New York

Nets That Work Co.

New York, NY · ~15 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nets That Work Co. runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Safety net system, erecting and dismantling at construction site workplace, earning a grade C.

Nets That Work Co.: 2.2 TCR = 80% of Safety net system, erecting and dismantling at construction site BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nets That Work Co. safety composite

Nets That Work Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

Nets That Work Co. injury rate improved

Nets That Work Co.'s TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/53
  • PHOTO Stafford Tower Crane…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~15 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stafford Tower Crane of America LLC - Arizona (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Nets That Work Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nets That Work Co. averages 2.2 TCR (80% of the Safety net system, erecting and dismantling at construction site BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nets That Work Co. TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Nets That Work Co. falls in its industry

1,634 Safety net system, erecting an establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 53 Safety net system, erecting an employers in New York.

Nets That Work Co. (15 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nets That Work Co.
Nets That Work Co. (15 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Nets That Work Co. has fewer employees than the Safety net system, erecting and dismantl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 8.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.1 6.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NY · New York

1,634 Safety net system, erecting and dismantling at construction site employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stafford Tower Crane of America LLC - Arizona 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana Concrete Pumpers LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentagon Technologies Site Services - Microchip 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Syracuse, NY 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Berwyn Properties LLC 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reddy Construction Co., Inc. 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Judlau TC Electric JV - JT01project 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103927 - MEC-TBTA RK-07 Rehab 15 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR M&M Lumber 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelton Intermediate School 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunn 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Finance 2.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.