Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · South Carolina

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt

Myrtle Beach, SC · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt: 9.6 TCR = 214% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt safety composite

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2019→2022

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt injury rate improved

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt's TCR fell 10.5 from 17.7 in 2019 to 7.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=17.7 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Myrtle Beach, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 214% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #13/23
  • PHOTO 4795-PD-AGS-AUGUSTA-…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4795-PD-AGS-AUGUSTA-AGS-PDMT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt averages 9.6 TCR (214% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt TCR series: 2019=17.7 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=7.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 23 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in South Carolina.

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt (60 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt
4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt (60 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-Pd-Myr-Myrtle Beach-Myr-Pdmt has fewer employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.2 5.4 4 0 0
2021 8.1 4.1 3 1 0
2020 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2019 17.7 17.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · SC · Myrtle Beach

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 244 employers in Myrtle Beach, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-AGS-AUGUSTA-AGS-PDMT 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RSW Fort Myers Airport 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - MCO 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDF-LOUISVILLE 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main office 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston LEC, Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poseidon Advanced Materials 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Forest Products Inc. 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA - Grand Strand Medical Center 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Founders National Golf, LLC 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-AGS-AUGUSTA-AGS-PDMT 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00985 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 178238-Ind-Speedway Br 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Wood River 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-FAT-FRESNO-FAT-PDMT 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG564 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG322 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0419 Dold Foods LLC 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.