Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

New Mercer Commons

Fort Collins, CO · ~116 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Mercer Commons runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

New Mercer Commons: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Mercer Commons safety composite

New Mercer Commons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

New Mercer Commons: 3.7 → 21.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.32× in 2024

New Mercer Commons's TCR rose 17.8 from 3.7 in 2016 to 21.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fort Collins, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

  • DART 21.5 DART
  • RANK #81/140
  • PHOTO Acacia Spring
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acacia Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

New Mercer Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Mercer Commons averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Mercer Commons TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=16 · 2024=21.5 · BLS 3.8

Where New Mercer Commons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

New Mercer Commons (116 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New Mercer Commons
New Mercer Commons (116 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

New Mercer Commons has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.5 21.5 6 11 0
2023 16.0 14.7 3 9 0
2022 12.6 12.6 3 6 0
2020 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2019 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2018 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2017 9.0 5.6 6 2 0
2016 3.7 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Fort Collins

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 268 employers in Fort Collins, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acacia Spring 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Memory Care of Monroe 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fountain View of Grant 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Villages at Forest Springs 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arvada Service Center-160 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon Glass Shop 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Materials - Pueblo 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&E Tire Inc. 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poudre Valley Hospital 1,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Collins 1,285 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Belgium Brewing Company: Fort Collins 759 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodward Inc. - Lincoln Campus Facility 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Walls Inc-N.Charleston 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Farnhamville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Tool and Cutlery Co. - Forge Division 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works and Engineering 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Bay Packaging Inc. Tulsa Division 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaumburg 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strawser Construction Inc. Construction Shop 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAREK Austin 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.