Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Azura Memory Care of Monroe

Name: Azura Memory Care of Monroe Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Monroe, WI · ~20 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 9.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azura Memory Care of Monroe runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Azura Memory Care of Monroe: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azura Memory Care of Monroe safety composite

Azura Memory Care of Monroe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 9.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.1

2016→2021

Azura Memory Care of Monroe injury rate improved

Azura Memory Care of Monroe's TCR fell 14.1 from 19.5 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=12.2 · 2021=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Monroe, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

DART 5.4 DART
RANK #213/273
PHOTO New Mercer Commons
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Mercer Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

9.3
New Mercer Com

9.3
Acacia Spring

9.3
Fountain View

9.3
The Villages a

9.3

What this shows Azura Memory Care of Monroe averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Azura Memory Care of Monroe TCR series: 2016=19.5 · 2018=0 · 2020=12.2 · 2021=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Azura Memory Care of Monroe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Azura Memory Care of Monroe (20 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Azura Memory Care of Monroe has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	5.4	5.4	1
2020	12.2	12.2	2
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2016	19.5	19.5	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Monroe

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 43 employers in Monroe, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	New Mercer Commons	FORT COLLINS, CO	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Acacia Spring	LAS VEGAS, NV	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fountain View of Grant	GRANT, MI	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	The Villages at Forest Springs	LOUISVILLE, KY	9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Alsum Farms Inc.	ARENA	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	FGI West Salem	WEST SALEM	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	760 Durand Agronomy	DURAND	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	764 Osseo Agronomy	OSSEO	20 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CB Monroe	Monroe	966 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Monroe Clinic Hospital	Monroe	694 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SCDC Monroe	Monroe	625 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Monroe Truck Equipment	Monroe	465 FTE
NAT-TCR	S1-Dallas	Dallas, TX	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Spring Creek Healthcare Center	Fort Collins, CO	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	NM Holdings	Albuquerque, NM	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Steve's Precision Dental Laboratory - Kansas	Mission, KS	9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Columbia Construction Inc.	Spring Hill, KS	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	County of Maui,Parks,Golf Course	Wailuku, HI	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	New Madrid Coating operations	Marston, MO	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Faribault Feed Mill	Faribault, MN	20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.