Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or pa · Ohio

New Method Packaging, Llc

Springfield, OH · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Method Packaging, Llc runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or pa workplace, earning a grade D.

New Method Packaging, Llc: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or pa BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Method Packaging, Llc safety composite

New Method Packaging, Llc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2021

New Method Packaging, Llc injury rate improved

New Method Packaging, Llc's TCR fell 2.6 from 7.1 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Springfield, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #101/109
  • PHOTO Yakima Container Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yakima Container Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

New Method Packaging, Llc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Method Packaging, Llc averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or pa BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Method Packaging, Llc TCR series: 2018=7.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where New Method Packaging, Llc falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 109 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Ohio.

New Method Packaging, Llc (37 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate New Method Packaging, Llc
New Method Packaging, Llc (37 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

New Method Packaging, Llc has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OH · Springfield

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or pa employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 186 employers in Springfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yakima Container Plant 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAPP Columbia 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innerpak of Wisconsin, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR McLean Packaging Corp. 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SW Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unified Restoration Systems, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Navistar Springfield Assembly Plant 1,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR VA Springfield 843 FTE
NAT-TCR AmeriCare Plus - Northern Neck 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR QUS 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dominion Senior Living of Crossville 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CCA Willow Run 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold Express, LLC. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Bird Farm 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Pipeline Construction Company 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE All-States, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.