Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Wisconsin

N.E.W. Printing

Appleton, WI · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

N.E.W. Printing runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade C.

N.E.W. Printing: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

N.E.W. Printing safety composite

N.E.W. Printing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

N.E.W. Printing injury rate improved

N.E.W. Printing's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=11.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Appleton, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #81/126
  • PHOTO TPI West
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TPI West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

N.E.W. Printing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows N.E.W. Printing averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

N.E.W. Printing TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=11 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where N.E.W. Printing falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 126 Offset printing (except books, employers in Wisconsin.

N.E.W. Printing (41 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate N.E.W. Printing
N.E.W. Printing (41 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

N.E.W. Printing has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.0 8.3 4 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.1 8.1 3 0 0
2016 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · WI · Appleton

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TPI West 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JS McCarthy Printers 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Falls Location 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trade Products, Inc 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunVest Solar LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mineral Point Operations Bldg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Construction Inc. - Ashland, WI 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger - P&G Green Bay 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Forest Grove School Dist 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Siler City Hatchery 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amano Enzyme U.S.A. Co., Ltd. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WB Homes Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Detroit Branch 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owensboro Parrish Goodwill 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Power Systems 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Columbia School Bus Garage 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.