Batters, prepared, made from purchased flour · Texas

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas

Mt Pleasant, TX · ~236 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Batters, prepared, made from purchased flour workplace, earning a grade C.

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Batters, prepared, made from purchased flour BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas safety composite

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2024

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas injury rate improved

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.1 in 2022 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.1 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311824 · Mt Pleasant, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO Taste Maker Foods, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taste Maker Foods, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Batters, prepared, made from purchased flour BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas falls in its industry

170 Batters, prepared, made from p establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Batters, prepared, made from p employers in Texas.

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas (236 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas
Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas (236 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Newly Weds Foods Mount Pleasant Texas has more employees than the Batters, prepared, made from purchased f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.1 7 0 0
2023 4.3 3.5 11 0 0
2022 4.1 3.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311824 · TX · Mt Pleasant

170 Batters, prepared, made from purchased flour employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 18 employers in Mt Pleasant, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taste Maker Foods, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerry-Calhoun 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida QCC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cerelia USA Bakery, inc 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - DFW West 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - DFW East 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pogue Construction Co., LP 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE C1628 - ETP - Ethane Export 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST PLANT 1,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR PREPARED FOODS 587 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roadclipper Enterprise Inc. 564 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Tex Manufacturing, LLC Mt Pleasant 543 FTE
NAT-TCR Titan Restoration of Tucson 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pearson 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Energy Cooperative 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Recycling Coordinators Inc 600 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit BHC WV, LLC DBA Highland Hospital 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilson Logistics, Inc. 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primary Poultry - California MO Plant 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craig Generating Station 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.