Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing · California

NGMS-F104

Mcclellan, CA · ~361 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NGMS-F104 runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NGMS-F104: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NGMS-F104 safety composite

NGMS-F104 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NGMS-F104 held a steady TCR band

NGMS-F104's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Mcclellan, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #17/45
  • PHOTO LakeMaster
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LakeMaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NGMS-F104 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NGMS-F104 averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NGMS-F104 TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where NGMS-F104 falls in its industry

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 45 Search, Detection, Navigation, employers in California.

NGMS-F104 (361 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NGMS-F104
NGMS-F104 (361 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

NGMS-F104 has more employees than the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 1 1 0
2022 2.2 1.9 3 4 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 4 0 0
2017 0.5 0.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CA · Mcclellan

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Mcclellan, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LakeMaster 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Niagara Falls Blvd (1951) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA, Van Nuys - 7821 Orion Ave. (SAS-EW) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Anning-Johnson Company Southern California 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hydranautics 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3081 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1914 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 421 4,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Villara-Sacramento 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DSR6 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Defense Microelectronics Activity 195 FTE
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Oklahoma City 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Subsite Electronics-OK 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kilihau Corporate Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coty Riverside 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Virginia Office 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Provo Office 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Newark 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc. 361 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.