Air traffic control radar systems and equipment manufacturing · Kansas

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa

Lenexa, KS · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air traffic control radar systems and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Air traffic control radar systems and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa safety composite

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2024

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa injury rate improved

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Lenexa, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO NGMS-F104
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NGMS-F104 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Air traffic control radar systems and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa TCR series: 2018=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa falls in its industry

388 Air traffic control radar syst establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Air traffic control radar syst employers in Kansas.

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa (27 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa
Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa (27 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Kustom Signals, Inc. - Lenexa has fewer employees than the Air traffic control radar systems and eq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · KS · Lenexa

388 Air traffic control radar systems and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 319 employers in Lenexa, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NGMS-F104 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LakeMaster 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Niagara Falls Blvd (1951) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA, Van Nuys - 7821 Orion Ave. (SAS-EW) 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turon Feed Yard 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA Timmerman - Colby 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecumseh Energy Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREAT BEND SC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR RailCrew Xpress 3,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR LENEXA (KSLEN) 2,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSLEN - LENEXA 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kiewit Corporation_9401 Renner Boulevard 1,653 FTE
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Crystal Lake Customer Care Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Medical Lodge 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gagnon, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Freestate Baltimore LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE JTM Products 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 186 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 073 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avista Colville 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.