Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · California

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS)

Name: Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Nipomo, CA · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 2.6
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade C.

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS): 2.2 TCR = 84% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) held a steady TCR band

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Nipomo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 84% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #12/21
PHOTO CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC
BOOK 6y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
CLS-CPIS-CHARL

2.2
Towson, MD (SS

2.2
Las Vegas FS (

2.2
Memphis FS (SS

2.1

What this shows Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) averages 2.2 TCR (84% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 21 Security alarm systems sales c employers in California.

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) (20 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	13.1	4.4	1	2
2017	0.0	0.0	0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · CA · Nipomo

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 31 employers in Nipomo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC	NORTH CHARLESTON, SC	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Towson, MD (SSS, CSS)	TOWSON, MD	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS)	LAS VEGAS, NV	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Memphis FS (SSS, CSS)	MEMPHIS, TN	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Sills Farms, Inc.	PLEASANT GROVE	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC	BRENTWOOD	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CALMEX CONTRACTING INC	PORTERVILLE	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Velvet Antler Ranch LLC	LINDEN	20 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Buenaventura Ranch, LLC	Nipomo	557 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sarc, Inc.	Nipomo	345 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WE LOVE BERRIES LLC	Nipomo	289 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cal South Harvesting LLC	Nipomo	285 FTE
NAT-TCR	Liberty Utilities Anawan Street	Fall River, MA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ashland LLC. Harmon Ave.	Columbus, OH	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	43111a - Carol Stream Zone	Carol Stream, IL	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	49711p - Midland Bin	Midland, TX	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Enclos - 220 CPS	New York, NY	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Grayville	Grayville, IL	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lifesprk - Vernon Terrace in Edina	Edina, MN	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	4702/3751 - Iron Ridge Transportation	Iron Ridge, WI	20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.