Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Nevada

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS)

Las Vegas, NV · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade C.

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS): 2.2 TCR = 86% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) held a steady TCR band

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Las Vegas, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Towson, MD (SSS, CSS)
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Towson, MD (SSS, CSS) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) averages 2.2 TCR (86% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Nevada.

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) (25 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS)
Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) (25 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · NV · Las Vegas

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 2,247 employers in Las Vegas, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Towson, MD (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Valley Associates, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE RheoMinerals Fernley 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Basin Water Co. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPB Utility Services, Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venetian Casino Resort, LLC 8,538 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Las Vegas 8,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bellagio llc 6,383 FTE
NAT-TCR Tweet/Garot Mechanical, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Towson, MD (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0080 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Extended Care Hospital of Monroe 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Black Hawk County Conservation 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - LAF 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Court Senior Care 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Automated, LLC 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.