Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Nebraska

NMC Group Norfolk Main

Norfolk, NE · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NMC Group Norfolk Main runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

NMC Group Norfolk Main: 5.9 TCR = 281% of Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NMC Group Norfolk Main safety composite

NMC Group Norfolk Main scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2021

NMC Group Norfolk Main injury rate improved

NMC Group Norfolk Main's TCR fell 1.5 from 10.1 in 2016 to 8.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Norfolk, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 281% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #31/38
  • PHOTO AR FRT - Van Buren
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AR FRT - Van Buren (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

NMC Group Norfolk Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NMC Group Norfolk Main averages 5.9 TCR (281% of the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NMC Group Norfolk Main TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=8.6 · BLS 2.1

Where NMC Group Norfolk Main falls in its industry

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 38 Heavy machinery and equipment employers in Nebraska.

NMC Group Norfolk Main (26 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NMC Group Norfolk Main
NMC Group Norfolk Main (26 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

NMC Group Norfolk Main has fewer employees than the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2020 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2019 8.5 4.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.1 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NE · Norfolk

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 87 employers in Norfolk, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AR FRT - Van Buren 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Bessemer AL-USA 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarke Power Services-107 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Timber Ridge 12347 445th Street Leigh NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Willow Creek NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFF 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farners Pride - Battle Creek Location 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Regional Health Services West Campus 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel Nebraska 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR AWG, Norfolk 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vulcraft Nebraska 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Rich Products 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Henry Mayo Newhall Mem Hosp-Fn 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Climate Pros-Westland 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-216-Pottery Barn 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE R&R Packaging, Inc. - Noel 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-ORMF 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-MO03 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #1914 DENVER, CO 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.