Distribution of electric power · Minnesota

Nobles Cooperative Electric

Worthington, MN · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nobles Cooperative Electric runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Nobles Cooperative Electric: 3.0 TCR = 254% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nobles Cooperative Electric safety composite

Nobles Cooperative Electric scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2019→2024

Nobles Cooperative Electric injury rate improved

Nobles Cooperative Electric's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.7 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Worthington, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 254% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/85
  • PHOTO 829 Jefferson St Atl…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 829 Jefferson St Atlanta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Nobles Cooperative Electric in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nobles Cooperative Electric averages 3.0 TCR (254% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nobles Cooperative Electric TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Nobles Cooperative Electric falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 85 Distribution of electric power employers in Minnesota.

Nobles Cooperative Electric (24 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nobles Cooperative Electric
Nobles Cooperative Electric (24 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Nobles Cooperative Electric has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Worthington

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Worthington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 829 Jefferson St Atlanta 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Central Missouri Electric Cooperative, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid-Carolina Electric Coop 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Region Facility 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY - WORTHINGTON 2,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Industries 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN,WORTHINGTON - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 272 FTE
NAT-TCR 88-Usf-Olf Holly Springs 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South County Drywall & Plastering, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Watterson Construction 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rhopac Fabricated Products 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE W.L. Deckert Co., Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE FabOhio Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Lisle Public Works Operations 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foundation Health Services Inc 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.