General Warehousing and Storage · Ohio

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3

Monroe, OH · ~1,851 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3: 11.6 TCR = 200% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 held a steady TCR band

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3's TCR held near 0.2 from 11.5 in 2019 to 11.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.5 · 2020=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Monroe, OH ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 11.6 · 200% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #534/556
  • PHOTO LaCrosse Facility
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 243 inj
  • SIZE ~1,851 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LaCrosse Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 averages 11.6 TCR (200% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 TCR series: 2019=11.5 · 2020=11.7 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #534 safest of 556 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Ohio.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 (1,851 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 (1,851 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.7 10.1 175 7 0
2019 11.5 10.3 68 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Monroe

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 72 employers in Monroe, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LaCrosse Facility 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCI-493110 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCI2 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DPS1 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. 1,848 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLAVORS 1,855 FTE
STATE-SIZE Findlay Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant 1,841 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2643-34380004-343804 1,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Concrete Constructors LLC 3,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH3 1,174 FTE
CITY-NEAR 540-FC001 887 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deceuninck North America-Monroe 534 FTE
NAT-TCR West Coast Florida Enterprises, Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LaCrosse Facility 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plascore Inc (Machined Core) 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Komatsu Forklift Factory Stores Alsip 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parsippany (Njpar) 1,851 FTE
NAT-SIZE Passavant Memorial Homes Family of Services 1,852 FTE
NAT-SIZE UTAS Rockford Plant 6 1,850 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Michael 029 1,850 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.