Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Ohio

Northeast Box

Ashtabula, OH · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Box runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Northeast Box: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Box safety composite

Northeast Box scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2024

Northeast Box injury rate improved

Northeast Box's TCR fell 5.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Ashtabula, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #70/109
  • PHOTO SAICA PACK US LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAICA PACK US LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Box in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Box averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Box TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Northeast Box falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 109 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Ohio.

Northeast Box (51 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Box
Northeast Box (51 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Northeast Box has fewer employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.7 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 5.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OH · Ashtabula

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 85 employers in Ashtabula, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAICA PACK US LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DENVER, CO (East) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging - Golden Valley, MN 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisville - A361 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Portsmouth Service Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Gas & Oil 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 922-NiSource-Zanesville OH-Muskingum Op Ctr 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashtabula County Medical Center 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass Composite Systems Company 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2359 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2359 388 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 497 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hammond in - 160 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmark Wisconsin 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Illinois Masonry Corp. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Fair Oaks 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockford Middle School 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Livonia 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Sterling Heights 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.