Telecommunications · Oregon

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR

Sherwood, OR · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications workplace, earning a grade D.

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR: 4.0 TCR = 144% of Telecommunications BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR safety composite

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2018→2020

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR injury rate improved

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR's TCR fell 0.6 from 5.7 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Sherwood, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 144% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #21/28
  • PHOTO ANS:ANCST - ANCST-Ch…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ANS:ANCST - ANCST-Charleston, SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR averages 4.0 TCR (144% of the Telecommunications BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=5.1 · BLS 2.8

Where NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR falls in its industry

1,605 Telecommunications establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 28 Telecommunications employers in Oregon.

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR (78 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR
NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR (78 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR has more employees than the Telecommunications median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.1 3.1 5 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 5.7 2.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OR · Sherwood

1,605 Telecommunications employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 62 employers in Sherwood, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANCST - ANCST-Charleston, SC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCS:LC037 - LC037-Okahumpka, FL 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Central Indiana REMC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAU:PA030 - PA030-Pauley-Grand Junction, C 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oregon Harvesting Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Coos Bay 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tidewater Contractors, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE John's Waterproofing Co 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 169 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4176 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4176 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Tmx2177 - Jonesboro 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Hospital of Florence 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Rehabilitation Hospital of Denton 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 370 Sacramento, Ca 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Masont Transit Authority 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union County Health & Rehab Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Architectural Woodworking Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turner Properties Inc - One CNN Center 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.