Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing · Arkansas

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc.

Blytheville, AR · ~987 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. safety composite

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2022

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. injury rate improved

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=1.5 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Blytheville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO Steel Dynamics, Inc.…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~987 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=1.5 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. falls in its industry

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Steel mill products (e.g., bar employers in Arkansas.

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. (987 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc.
Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. (987 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. has more employees than the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, r median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.4 8 0 0
2017 1.5 0.8 16 1 0
2016 1.2 0.7 12 1 2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · AR · Blytheville

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 59 employers in Blytheville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland-Cliffs Butler Works 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Steel South Carolina 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Berryville Plant 988 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT2 990 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nucor Yamato Steel 993 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel Arkansas 845 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION 503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tenaris Hickman 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 62 280 FTE
NAT-TCR City Attorney 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sea Hunt Boats 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-10D8323 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wound & Hyperbaric Center & Outpatient Rehab 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2045-00011W 987 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Center for Autism 987 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Marshalls DC 987 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forensics Mental Health Program - Main Campus 987 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.