Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · South Carolina

Oak Mitsui Camden

Camden, SC · ~71 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Mitsui Camden runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

Oak Mitsui Camden: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Mitsui Camden safety composite

Oak Mitsui Camden scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oak Mitsui Camden: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2020

Oak Mitsui Camden's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Camden, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Houston Plating Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Plating Company - South Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oak Mitsui Camden in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Mitsui Camden averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Mitsui Camden TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Oak Mitsui Camden falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Electroplating metals and form employers in South Carolina.

Oak Mitsui Camden (71 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Mitsui Camden
Oak Mitsui Camden (71 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Oak Mitsui Camden has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.2 1.4 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · SC · Camden

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 52 employers in Camden, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Plating Company - South Houston 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRG Global- Ripley 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORAFOL Precision Technology Solutions 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embee Processing 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edisto Electric Cooperative, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairfield Electric Cooperative, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Langston Construction LLC of the Piedmont 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roebuck Buildings Co., Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR MUSC Health Kershaw 2,555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw County School District 1,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw County Government 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw Health Hospital 663 FTE
NAT-TCR Fresh Brew Group USA, L.P. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aviation Power & Marine Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cal Almond 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadridge Financial Solutions - Edgewood One 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Courtyard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE PuratosKenosha 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheraton Silver Spring 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Pain Management & Spine Specialists 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.