Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills · Connecticut

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC

Danbury, CT · ~276 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC runs at 665% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills workplace, earning a grade F.

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC: 17.3 TCR = 665% of Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC safety composite

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2021→2022

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC injury rate improved

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC's TCR fell 6.3 from 20.4 in 2021 to 14.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=20.4 · 2022=14.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Danbury, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 665% of ind

  • DART 12.7 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO East Central Solid W…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Central Solid Waste Commission (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC averages 17.3 TCR (665% of the Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC TCR series: 2021=20.4 · 2022=14.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC falls in its industry

288 Refuse collecting and operatin establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Refuse collecting and operatin employers in Connecticut.

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC (276 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC
Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC (276 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT LLC has more employees than the Refuse collecting and operating solid wa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.1 12.7 40 0 0
2021 20.4 6.8 0 39 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · CT · Danbury

288 Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Central Solid Waste Commission 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lane County Public Works Glenwood 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landfill Technologies, Vertedero de Fajardo 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Enfield Division of Solid Waste 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6354-CT16 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockville General Hospital 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park & Recreation 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stew Leonard's - Newington 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR 4186-DC1 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wallboard - Braintree 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02001 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Belle Isle Park - Dnr 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal CG -Spring Green CG 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4848 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Ohio 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klein Tools, Inc 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.