Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of East Sacramento

Sacramento, CA · ~123 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of East Sacramento runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oakmont of East Sacramento: 7.3 TCR = 193% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of East Sacramento safety composite

Oakmont of East Sacramento scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of East Sacramento: 6.2 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Oakmont of East Sacramento's TCR rose 1.3 from 6.2 in 2022 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #209/635
  • PHOTO Buckingham Heights, …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buckingham Heights, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of East Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of East Sacramento averages 7.3 TCR (193% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of East Sacramento TCR series: 2022=6.2 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of East Sacramento falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #209 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of East Sacramento (123 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of East Sacramento
Oakmont of East Sacramento (123 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of East Sacramento has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 4.7 8 0 0
2023 8.3 8.3 8 1 0
2022 6.2 6.2 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Sacramento

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buckingham Heights, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Sacramento 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Brookfield 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE ORCHARDS 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Four Star Fruit 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE CADY2 - 05 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Vineyards 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeBernardi Bros 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR R & J Trucking Dayton Terminal 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cuyahoga Falls Oh - 3347 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamps Pallets Lansing 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR A&K Construction 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quanex IG Systems Inc. DBA Quanex Custom Mixing 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Insulated Panel Group - Sheridan AR 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buncombe County-Public Health 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL312 Hosford OSB 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.