Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento

Sacramento, CA · ~144 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento: 7.3 TCR = 193% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento safety composite

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2023→2024

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento injury rate improved

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento's TCR fell 0.9 from 7.8 in 2023 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.8 · 2024=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #210/635
  • PHOTO Buckingham Heights, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buckingham Heights, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Senior Living Sacramento averages 7.3 TCR (193% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento TCR series: 2023=7.8 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Carlton Senior Living Sacramento falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento (144 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Senior Living Sacramento
Carlton Senior Living Sacramento (144 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 3.9 2 5 0
2023 7.8 6.8 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Sacramento

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buckingham Heights, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of East Sacramento 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azura Brookfield 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE ORCHARDS 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matsui Nursery, Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilltop Ranch Inc. - Turlock Rd. 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAGO'S CONTRACTING 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 1230 3RD 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR LifeLine Ambulance 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amalga Composites 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Anel Corporation 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Siena Gardens 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BATAVIA 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Eye Produce, Inc. 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meramec Instrument Transformer Company 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calvert Masonry, Inc. 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.