Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

The Village at Sydney Creek

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~65 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Sydney Creek runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Sydney Creek: 14.1 TCR = 370% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Sydney Creek safety composite

The Village at Sydney Creek scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2017→2023

The Village at Sydney Creek injury rate improved

The Village at Sydney Creek's TCR fell 6.0 from 11.2 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 26.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.2 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=26.8 · 2023=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Luis Obispo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 370% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #487/635
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKET NIANT…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKET NIANTIC OPERATIONS LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Sydney Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Sydney Creek averages 14.1 TCR (370% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Sydney Creek TCR series: 2017=11.2 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=26.8 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Sydney Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #487 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

The Village at Sydney Creek (65 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Sydney Creek
The Village at Sydney Creek (65 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Village at Sydney Creek has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 1.7 3 0 0
2019 26.8 26.8 15 0 0
2018 13.1 13.1 7 0 0
2017 11.2 9.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Luis Obispo

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKET NIANTIC OPERATIONS LLC 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand of Prospect OPCO, LLC 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Spirit Lake 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenton Pointe Assisted Living 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunnySlope Tree Farm, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Nursery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Jager Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Demler Enterprises, LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR AWP-Riverton 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kurth Sheet Metal Inc 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ihop 3081 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-03285 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ranfac Corp. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPA Jackson Distribution Center 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond American Homes of Arizona-Phoenix 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Spring Milwaukee Division 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.